Difference between revisions of "Sourcecode"

From FBSA Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
m
m
Line 48: Line 48:
 
</div>
 
</div>
 
<!-- Sixth Box -->
 
<!-- Sixth Box -->
<div style="background-color: #000000; border-style: solid; border-radius: 25px; width:500px; height:790px; margin-left: 32%; margin-bottom: 4%; margin-top: 6%; vertical-align: middle; horizontal-align: middle;">
+
<div style="background-color: #000000; border-style: solid; border-radius: 25px; width:500px; height:790px; margin-left: 32%; margin-bottom: 4%; margin-top: 4%; vertical-align: middle; horizontal-align: middle;">
 
<center>
 
<center>
 
https://i.imgur.com/4bkg5CS.png
 
https://i.imgur.com/4bkg5CS.png
Line 76: Line 76:
 
<div style="margin-right: 8%; margin-bottom: 3%; margin-top: 2%; vertical-align: middle; horizontal-align: middle;">
 
<div style="margin-right: 8%; margin-bottom: 3%; margin-top: 2%; vertical-align: middle; horizontal-align: middle;">
 
<center>
 
<center>
https://i.postimg.cc/wxbVqHzt/vergilboxtwelve.png
+
https://i.imgur.com/tNnIOV6.png
 
</center></div>
 
</center></div>
  

Revision as of 06:38, 1 December 2020

!

Work in Progress

This article or user page is a work in progress. It may undergo critical changes while this message remains in place. As a courtesy, please avoid making minor edits to this page while this message is displayed, in order to avoid edit conflicts.


D4QGAq6.png

IY3UTWp.png

8fvrevv.png

UteojXC.png

HqrLQJG.png

JsiPASz.png x36w4ec.png

VA8pPh4.png

Caie0ra.png

N0RXSig.png

Cp8nL8l.png

4bkg5CS.png

uOnJG7v.png

rqrykVQ.png

Jav4kzk.png

To9Ei3m.png

tNnIOV6.png

   Legislation would clarify the definition regarding personhood if Congress found it necessary. Without such a definition a plain reading of the Constitution establishes protection within the first and fourth amendments, regardless if the citizen is biological or mechanical. Stare decisis dictates that speech applies to thoughts and expression equally, and therefore cannot be restricted, under the reasonable analysis pertaining to the intention of the speech. And, in order for the citizen to be secure in their person, is protected from unreasonable search and seizure.
   Mr. Grajek had the authority to form a contractual agreement but could not forfeit his freedom of speech. The United States similarly could not seize his data despite written consent, as it has not been demonstrated in precedent or law that the information can be distinguished from thoughts, and thus falls under speech. Freedom of speech exists perpetually under the law of the Constitution and cannot be relinquished.